Dialogue 45 (04):627-46 (2006)
|Abstract||It is commonly assumed, at least by continental philosophers, that epistemological hermeneutics and foundationalism are incompatible. I argue that this assumption is mistaken. If I am correct, the analytic and continental traditions may be closer than is commonly supposed. Hermeneutics, as I will argue, is a descriptive claim about human cognition, and foundationalism is a normative claim about how beliefs ought to be related to one another. Once the positions are stated in this way, their putative incompatibility vanishes. Also, to inspire further research I include an appendix which contains an unfinished prototype of a hermeneutic foundationalism.|
|Keywords||foundationalism hermeneutics continental epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Bergmann (2004). What's NOT Wrong with Foundationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):161–165.
John Kekes (1983). An Argument Against Foundationalism. Philosophia 12 (March):273-281.
James A. Keller (1986). Foundationalism, Circular Justification, and the Levels Gambit. Synthese 68 (2):205 - 212.
Robert Schroer (2008). Memory Foundationalism and the Problem of Unforgotten Carelessness. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):74–85.
Paul R. Noble (1995). Hermeneutics and Postmodernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part II. Religious Studies 31 (1):1 - 22.
D. Z. Phillips (1988/1995). Faith After Foundationalism: Plantinga-Rorty-Lindbeck-Berger: Critiques and Alternatives. Westview Press.
Peter Tramel (2008). Haack's Foundherentism is a Foundationalism. Synthese 160 (2):215 - 228.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1986). The Confusion Over Foundationalism. Philosophia 16 (3-4):345-354.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1984). What is Wrong with Minimal Foundationalism? Erkenntnis 21 (2):175-184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,832 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?