David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2004)
How do historians, comparative linguists, biblical and textual critics and evolutionary biologists establish beliefs about the past? How do they know the past? This book presents a philosophical analysis of the disciplines that offer scientific knowledge of the past. Using the analytic tools of contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science the book covers such topics as evidence, theory, methodology, explanation, determination and underdetermination, coincidence, contingency and counterfactuals in historiography. Aviezer Tucker's central claim is that historiography as a scientific discipline should be thought of as an effort to explain the evidence of past events. He also emphasizes the similarity between historiographic methodology to Darwinian evolutionary biology. This is an important, fresh new approach to historiography and will be read by philosophers, historians and social scientists interested in the methodological foundations of their disciplines.
|Keywords||Historiography History Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$47.00 used (60% off) $97.43 new (16% off) $109.87 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||D13.T85 2004|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eric Desjardins (2011). Historicity and Experimental Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):339-364.
Adrian Currie (2015). Marsupial Lions and Methodological Omnivory: Function, Success and Reconstruction in Paleobiology. Biology and Philosophy 30 (2):187-209.
Tristan Casabianca (2013). The Shroud of Turin: A Historiographical Approach. Heythrop Journal 54 (3):414-423.
Adrian Mitchell Currie (2013). Narratives, Mechanisms and Progress in Historical Science. Synthese 191 (6):1-21.
Ben Jeffares (2010). Guessing the Future of the Past. Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):125-142.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Gorman (2005). Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography by Aviezer Tucker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. VII + 291. £45.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (2):292-300.
Lloyd S. Kramer & Sarah C. Maza (eds.) (2002). A Companion to Western Historical Thought. Blackwell Publishers.
Ranjan Ghosh (2012). Lover's Quarrel with the Past: Romance, Representation, Reading. Berghahn Books.
Mark Day (2006). Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography - By Aviezer Tucker. Philosophical Books 47 (4):386-388.
Ronald Edmund Doel & Thomas Söderqvist (eds.) (2006). The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology, and Medicine: Writing Recent Science. Routledge.
Claire Norton (ed.) (2007). Nationalism, Historiography, and the (Re)Construction of the Past. New Academia Pub..
Aviezer Tucker (ed.) (2009). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Wiley-Blackwell.
Theodore Schatzki (2006). On Studying the Past Scientifically. Inquiry 49 (4):380 – 399.
Zachary Sayre Schiffman (2011). The Birth of the Past. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #96,404 of 1,725,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,572 of 1,725,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?