David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411 (2011)
We identify a class of paradoxes that is neither set-theoretical nor semantical, but that seems to depend on intensionality. In particular, these paradoxes arise out of plausible properties of propositional attitudes and their objects. We try to explain why logicians have neglected these paradoxes, and to show that, like the Russell Paradox and the direct discourse Liar Paradox, these intensional paradoxes are recalcitrant and challenge logical analysis. Indeed, when we take these paradoxes seriously, we may need to rethink the commonly accepted methods for dealing with the logical paradoxes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.) (2009). The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press.
C. Anthony Anderson (1980). Some New Axioms for the Logic of Sense and Denotation: Alternative (0). Noûs 14 (2):217-234.
C. Anthony Anderson (1987). Semantical Antinomies in the Logic of Sense and Denotation. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):99-114.
Jon Barwise (1987). The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford University Press.
George Bealer (1982). Quality and Concept. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hartry Field (2007). Solving the Paradoxes, Escaping Revenge. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Gary Mar & Paul St Denis (1999). What the Liar Taught Achilles. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Greg Restall (2007). Curry's Revenge: The Costs of Non-Classical Solutions to the Paradoxes of Self-Reference. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert (2010). An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
Barry Hartley Slater, Logical Paradoxes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Keith Simmons (2005). A Berry and a Russell Without Self-Reference. Philosophical Studies 126 (2):253 - 261.
Peter Eldridge-Smith (2007). Paradoxes and Hypodoxes of Time Travel. In Jan Lloyd Jones, Paul Campbell & Peter Wylie (eds.), Art and Time. Australian Scholarly Publishing. 172--189.
J. C. Beall (ed.) (2003). Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #28,703 of 1,103,009 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #24,631 of 1,103,009 )
How can I increase my downloads?