David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 18 (3):225-240 (2012)
It is common to encounter the criticism that Joseph Raz’s service conception of authority is flawed because it appears to justify too much. This essay examines the extent to which the service conception accommodates this critique. Two variants of this critical strategy are considered. The first, exemplified by Kenneth Einar Himma, alleges that the service conception fails to conceptualize substantive limits on the legitimate exercise of authority. This variant fails; Raz has elucidated substantive limits on jurisdiction within the service conception of authority, albeit reluctantly and equivocally. The second, exemplified by Scott Hershovitz, alleges that the service conception fails to conceptualize procedural limits on the legitimate exercise of authority. He objects that the normal justification thesis fails to deny legitimacy to rational and expert dictators. This argument is more potent, but its force is concealed when it is aimed at the normal justification thesis rather than the quite separate jurisdictional limits of Raz’s theory. Clarifying those jurisdictional aspects of the service conception shows why the first argument fails and exposes the real strength of the second. Both variants have important consequences for our understanding of the service conception
|Keywords||Authority Legitimacy Joseph Raz Democracy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Samantha Besson (2005). Review Article: Democracy, Law and Authority. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (1):89-99.
Tom Christiano, Democracy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
T. Endicott (2005). The Subsidiarity of Law and the Obligation to Obey. American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (1):233-248.
Scott Hershovitz (2003). Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority. Legal Theory 9 (3):201-220.
Kenneth Einar Himma (2007). Just 'Cause You're Smarter Than Me Doesn't Give You a Right to Tell Me What to Do: Legitimate Authority and the Normal Justification Thesis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1):121-150.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Star & Candice Delmas (2011). Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence 2 (1):143-160.
Scott Hershovitz (2011). The Role of Authority. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (7).
David Rondel (2012). Raz on Authority and Democracy. Dialogue 51 (2):211-230.
Margaret Martin (2010). Raz's The Morality of Freedom: Two Models of Authority. Jurisprudence 1 (1):63-84.
Bas van der Vossen (2008). On Legitimacy and Authority: A Response to Krehoff. Res Publica 14 (4):299-302.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Darwall (2011). Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.
Dimitrios Kyritsis (2012). The Persistent Significance of Jurisdiction. Ratio Juris 25 (3):343-367.
Andrea C. Westlund (2011). Autonomy, Authority, and Answerability. Jurisprudence 2 (1):161-179.
Bernd Krehoff (2008). Legitimate Political Authority and Sovereignty: Why States Cannot Be the Whole Story. Res Publica 14 (4):283-297.
Christopher S. King (2012). Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2012). Estlund on Epistocracy: A Critique. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (3):241-258.
Added to index2012-02-18
Total downloads25 ( #81,008 of 1,679,365 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,917 of 1,679,365 )
How can I increase my downloads?