The television theory of perception
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (33):51-57 (1958)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoger Hadley (1989). Television News Ethics: A Survey of Television News Directors. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):249 – 264.
John Dilworth (2005). A Naturalistic, Reflexive Dispositional Approach to Perception. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):583-601.
Howard M. Robinson (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.
Edmond L. Wright (1993). More Qualia Trouble for Functionalism: The Smythies TV-Hood Analogy. Synthese 97 (3):365-82.
J. M. Wober (1988). Never Mind the Picture, Sense the Screen. Journal of Moral Education 16 (2):87-93.
Noël Carroll (1996). Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart Nolan (2003). Box Clever: The Intelligence of Television. AI and Society 17 (1):25-36.
John Tucker (1958). Review: The Television Theory of Perception. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (33):51 - 57.
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
