David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics (EJTP) 7 (24):57-78 (2010)
The paper discusses the possibility of constructing economic models using the methodology of model construction in classical mechanics. At the same time, unlike the "econophysical" approach, the properties of economic models are derived without involvement of any equivalent physical properties, but with account of the types of symmetry existing in the economic system. It has been shown that at this approach practically all known mechanical variables have their "economic twins". The variational principle is formulated on the basis of formal mathematical construction without involving the subjective factor common to the majority of models in economics. The dynamics of interaction of two companies has been studies in details, on the basis of which we can proceed to modeling of more complex and realistic economic systems. Prediction of the possibility of constructing economic theory on the basis of primary principles analogously to physics has been made.
|Keywords||econophysical variational principle primary principles|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rod Cross (1995). Metaphors and Time Reversibility and Irreversibility in Economic Systems. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (1):123-134.
Cyril Hédoin (2014). Models in Economics Are Not (Always) Nomological Machines A Pragmatic Approach to Economists' Modeling Practices. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (4):424-459.
Ken Dennis (1995). A Logical Critique of Mathematical Formalism in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):181-200.
Steven Rappaport (2001). Economic Models as Mini-Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):275-285.
Sergiy Melnyk, ALGEBRA OF FUNDAMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AS A BASIS OF DYNAMICS OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS. arXiv.
D. Wade Hands (2001). Economic Methodology is Dead - Long Live Economic Methodology: Thirteen Theses on the New Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):49-63.
Filippo Cesarano (2006). Economic History and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (4):447-467.
Jack Vromen (2012). Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):77-81.
Christian Fuchs & John Collier (2007). A Dynamic Systems View of Economic and Political Theory. Theoria 54 (113):23-52.
S. I. Melnyk & I. G. Tuluzov, Fundamental Measurements in Economics and in the Theory of Consciousness.
I. G. Tuluzov & S. I. Melnyk, Fundamental Measurements in Economics and in the Theory of Consciousness (Manifestation of Quantum-Mechanical Properties of Economic Objects in Slit Measurements).
Michael Weisberg (2013). Modeling Herding Behavior and its Risks. Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (1):6 - 18.
J. Barkley Rosser, Complex Ecologic-Economic Dynamics and Environmental Policy Forthcoming, Ecological Economics.
Julian Reiss (2001). Natural Economic Quantities and Their Measurement. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):287-311.
Uskali Mäki (1994). Methodology Might Matter, but Weintraub's Meta-Methodology Shouldn't. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):215-232.
Added to index2011-12-31
Total downloads44 ( #90,669 of 1,789,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #93,512 of 1,789,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?