Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 55 (2):170-190 (2010)
|Abstract||According to Alexander of Aphrodisias, our potential intellect is a purely receptive capacity. Alexander also claims that, in order for us to actualise our intellectual potentiality, the intellect needs to abstract what is intelligible from enmattered perceptible objects. Now a problem emerges: How is it possible for a purely receptive capacity to perform such an abstraction? It will be argued that even though Alexander's reaction to this question causes some tension in his theory, the philosophical motivation for it is a sound one. Rather than a calculation of actualities and potentialities, the doctrine of receptivity is supposed to explain how human beings come to grasp universal aspects of reality in an accurate manner|
|Keywords||receptivity abstraction Alexander of Aphrodisias accurate cognition theory of intellect|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Siobhan Nash-Marshall (2002). The Intellect, Receptivity, and Material Singulars in Aquinas. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):371-388.
Robert B. Todd (1976). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics: A Study of the De Mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation and Commentary. Brill.
Lloyd Gerson (2004). The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle's De Anima. Phronesis 49 (4):348-373.
Jonathan Barnes & Susanne Bobzien (1991). Alexander of Aphrodisias' on Aristotle's Prior Analytics 1.1-7. Duckworth.
Luca Gili (2012). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Solution to the Puzzle of the Two Modal Barbaras: A Semantic Approach. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23:35-64.
Anne Sheppard (1994). Two Aristotelian Commentators on the Intellect: The de Intellectu Attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius' Paraphrase of Aristotle de Anima 3.4-. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):434-435.
H. J. Blumenthal (1991). Alexander of Aphrodisias' Ethical Problems R. W. Sharples (Tr.): Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ethical Problems. (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.) Pp. 145. London: Duckworth, 1990. £24. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):320-322.
D. Frank (1996). Review. Alexander of Aphrodisias. Alexander of Aphrodisias, Quaestiones 2.16-3.15. R W Sharples (Tr). The Classical Review 46 (2):235-236.
R. W. Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43 - 55.
Sharples (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts. Phronesis 50 (1):43-55.
Catherine Jack Deavel (2009). Thomas Aquinas and Knowledge of Material Objects. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:269-278.
Richard Gaskin (1993). Alexander's Sea Battle: A Discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias "De Fato" 10. Phronesis 38 (1):75 - 94.
Added to index2010-09-12
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 725,222 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 725,222 )
How can I increase my downloads?