David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):495-513 (1996)
The General Account of Pleasure in Plato's Philebus THOMAS M. TUOZZO 1. INTRODUCTION DOES PLATO IN THE Philebus present a single general account of pleasure, applicable to all of the kinds of pleasure he discusses in that dialogue? Gosling and Taylor think not;' Dorothea Frede has recently reasserted a version of the contrary, traditional view. 2 The traditional view, I shall argue in this essay, is correct: the Philebus does contain a general account of pleasure applicable to all pleasures. Nonetheless, Gosling and Taylor have pointed to a real difficulty with the traditional view, a difficulty that has never been adequately ad- dressed. To show how it can be overcome will involve showing that Plato's account of pleasure, and his analyses of other phenomena of moral psychol- ogy in the Philebus, are more complex and subtle than has often been realized. Gosling and Taylor offer two considerations in support of their view: Socrates insists against Protarchus that different pleasures can be "most oppo- site" to each other, which suggests that no single account can apply to them all,s and Socrates does not indicate how the most likely candidate for a general account of pleasure, one involving the restoration of a natural har- ,j. c. B. Gosling and C. C. W. Taylor, The Greeks on Pleasure , 14o: "It seems clear that in the Philebus Plato has no general formula to encapsulate the nature of pleasure .... " So, too, C. Hampton, Pleasure,..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Emily Fletcher (2014). Plato on Pure Pleasure and the Best Life. Phronesis 59 (2):113-142.
Similar books and articles
Cristina Ionescu (2008). Plato's Understanding of Pleasure in the Philebus. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:1-18.
Gabriela Roxana Carone (2000). Hedonism and the Pleasureless Life in Plato's Philebus. Phronesis 45 (4):257-283.
James L. Wood (2007). Freedom in the Philebus. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:205-216.
Verity Harte (2004). The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):111–128.
J. Tate (1946). The Philebus R. Hackforth. Plato's Examination of Pleasure. A Translation of the Philebus, with Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Vi+143. Cambridge: University Press, 1945. Cloth, 10s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):29-30.
Plato (1972). Philebus and Epinomis. New York,Barnes & Noble Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #128,739 of 1,902,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #324,369 of 1,902,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?