On the intuitionistic strength of monotone inductive definitions

Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):790-798 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove here that the intuitionistic theory $T_{0}\upharpoonright + UMID_{N}$ , or even $EEJ\upharpoonright + UMID_{N}$ , of Explicit Mathematics has the strength of $\prod_{2}^{1} - CA_{0}$ . In Section I we give a double-negation translation for the classical second-order $\mu-calculus$ , which was shown in [ $M\ddot{o}02$ ] to have the strength of $\prod_{2}^{1}-CA_{0}$ . In Section 2 we interpret the intuitionistic $\mu-calculus$ in the theory $EETJ\upharpoonright + UMID_{N}$ . The question about the strength of monotone inductive definitions in $T_{0}$ was asked by S. Feferman in 1982, and - assuming classical logic - was addressed by M. Rathjen

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Strength of some Semi-Constructive Theories.Solomon Feferman - 2012 - In Ulrich Berger, Hannes Diener, Peter Schuster & Monika Seisenberger (eds.), Logic, Construction, Computation. De Gruyter. pp. 201-226.
Monotone inductive definitions in explicit mathematics.Michael Rathjen - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):125-146.
Explicit mathematics with the monotone fixed point principle.Michael Rathjen - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):509-542.
Realization of analysis into explicit mathematics.Sergei Tupailo - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1848-1864.
Monotone inductive definitions over the continuum.Douglas Cenzer - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1):188-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-05

Downloads
29 (#536,973)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?