David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260 (2011)
Louis Mink wrote a classic study of R. G. Collingwood that led to his most important contribution to the philosophy of history, his account of narrative. Central to this account was the non-detachability thesis, that facts became historical facts through incorporation into narratives, and the thesis that narratives were not comparable to the facts or to one another. His book on Collingwood was critical of Collingwood's idea that there were facts in history that we get through self-knowledge but which are nevertheless objective, his account of re-enactment, and his notion of absolute presuppositions. It is illuminating to compare Collingwood to Weber with respect to these puzzling arguments, for the same issues arise there in different form. Recent work in social neuroscience on mirroring allows a different approach to these puzzles: mirror system “knowledge“ of others and simulation fit, respectively, with Weber's idea of direct observational understanding and Collingwood's re-enactment account. This account allows for the detaching of historical facts about thoughts and action from narrative
|Keywords||Weber Verstehen mirror system Mink Collingwood|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Turner (2013). Where Explanation Ends: Understanding as the Place the Spade Turns in the Social Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):532-538.
Similar books and articles
John Luckman (1991). Metaphysics, History and the Unpublished Manuscripts. International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):27-45.
Louis O. Mink (1969). Mind, History, and Dialectic: The Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood. Distributed by Harper & Row.
Karim Dharamsi (2008). From Norms to Uses and Back Again. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):167-184.
Raymun Festin (2005). At the Crossroads of Historiography and Metaphysics of History. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):35-47.
Serge Grigoriev (2008). Continuity of the Rational: Naturalism and Historical Understanding in Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):119-137.
William H. Dray (1995). History as Re-Enactment: R.G. Collingwood's Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
Dimitrios Vardoulakis (2004). The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer's Criticism of Collingwood. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
R. G. Collingwood (1993). The Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
David Boucher (1989). The Social and Political Thought of R.G. Collingwood. Cambridge University Press.
R. G. Collingwood (1993). The Idea of History. Revised Edition. Oxford University Press.
W. Jan van der Dussen (1981). History as a Science: The Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood. Distributors, Kluwer Boston.
P. Gardiner (1952). The 'Object' of Historical Knowledge. Philosophy 27 (102):211-220.
Philip Smallwood (2000). Historical Re-Enactment, Literary Transmission, and the Value of R. G. Collingwood. Translation and Literature 9:3-24.
Nathan Rotenstreich (1960). From Facts to Thoughts: Collingwood's Views on the Nature of History. Philosophy 35 (133):122 - 137.
Added to index2011-07-16
Total downloads29 ( #164,418 of 1,932,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #332,988 of 1,932,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?