David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):133-151 (2012)
This paper investigates the ethical issues surrounding the concept of Internet neutrality focusing specifically on the correlation between neutrality and fairness. Moving from an analysis of the many available definitions of Internet neutrality and the heterogeneity of the Internet infrastructure, the common assumption that a neutral Internet is also a fair Internet is challenged. It is argued that a properly neutral Internet supports undesirable situations in which few users can exhaust the majority of the available resources or in which specific types of applications and services cannot be developed or properly deployed. The solution offered to these shortcomings is based on (1) an environmental approach to the Internet, (2) the four guiding principles of Floridi’s Information Ethics and (3) a principle called ‘Information Diversity’. The paper is divided into six sections. Section 1 briefly presents the debate concerning the concepts of network and Internet neutrality. Section 2 poses a general and unifying definition of Internet neutrality based on the critical assessment of several domain-specific approaches to the problem of neutrality. Section 3 is dedicated to the analysis of the relationship between Internet neutrality and the ethical principle of fairness. Section 4 introduces Floridi’s Information Ethics, the definition of Information Diversity and an analysis of how they can be used to address the limitations of Internet neutrality. Section 5 summarises the ethics of Internet neutrality and Information Diversity defining their relationship. Section 6 reviews the arguments presented in the paper clarifying the foundational role played by Information Diversity and Information Ethics in Internet policy-making activity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Ess (2008). Luciano Floridi's Philosophy of Information and Information Ethics: Critical Reflections and the State of the Art. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):89-96.
Luciano Floridi (2008). Information Ethics: A Reappraisal. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):189-204.
Citations of this work BETA
Luciano Floridi (2013). Distributed Morality in an Information Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):727-743.
Similar books and articles
Göran Collste (2002). The Internet Doctor and Medical Ethics Ethical Implications of the Introduction of the Internet Into Medical Encounters. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):121-125.
Roger Clarke (1999). Ethics and the Internet. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 18 (3/4):153-167.
Robert van Es, Warren French & Felix Stellmaszek (2004). Resolving Conflicts Over Ethical Issues: Face-to-Face Versus Internet Negotiations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):165-172.
Robert Van Es, Warren French & Felix Stellmaszek (2004). Resolving Conflicts Over Ethical Issues: Face-to-Face Versus Internet Negotiations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1/2):165 - 172.
Victoria D. Bush, Beverly T. Venable & Alan J. Bush (2000). Ethics and Marketing on This Internet: Practitioners' Perceptions of Societal, Industry and Company Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):237 - 248.
Keren Lehavot (2009). “Myspace” or Yours? The Ethical Dilemma of Graduate Students' Personal Lives on the Internet. Ethics and Behavior 19 (2):129 – 141.
Heidi E. Keller & Sandra Lee (2003). Ethical Issues Surrounding Human Participants Research Using the Internet. Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):211 – 219.
Craig A. Childress & Joy K. Asamen (1998). The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):19 – 35.
Edward H. Spence (2009). A Universal Model for the Normative Evaluation of Internet Information. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Chat Garcia Ramilo, Who is Ruling the Internet? Gender Sensitive Research Into Internet Censorship as a Central Area of Internet Governance.
Elizabeth H. Bassett & Kate O'Riordan (2002). Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):233-247.
Cynthia Townley & Mitch Parsell (2004). Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):271-277.
Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit (2003). Reliability of Information on the Internet: Some Distinctions. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
Herman T. Tavani & Frances S. Grodzinsky (2002). Cyberstalking, Personal Privacy, and Moral Responsibility. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2):123-132.
John Weckert (2000). What is so Bad About Internet Content Regulation? Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):105-111.
Added to index2011-09-01
Total downloads37 ( #73,446 of 1,699,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?