David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):419-448 (2012)
Ontological pluralism is the doctrine that there are different ways or modes of being. In contemporary guise, it is the doctrine that a logically perspicuous description of reality will use multiple quantifiers which cannot be thought of as ranging over a single domain. Although thought defeated for some time, recent defenses have shown a number of arguments against the view unsound. However, another worry looms: that despite looking like an attractive alternative, ontological pluralism is really no different than its counterpart, ontological monism. In this paper, after explaining the worry in detail, I argue that considerations dealing with the nature of the logic ontological pluralists ought to endorse, coupled with an attractive philosophical thesis about the relationship between logic and metaphysics, show this worry to be unfounded
|Keywords||Ontological pluralism Free logic Many-sorted logic Metaphysics Notational variants Logical realism Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Cian Dorr (2005). What We Disagree About When We Disagree About Ontology. In Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. 234--86.
Herbert B. Enderton (1972). A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. New York,Academic Press.
John Etchemendy (1983). The Doctrine of Logic as Form. Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (3):319 - 334.
Hartry Field (1991). Metalogic and Modality. Philosophical Studies 62 (1):1 - 22.
Citations of this work BETA
Joshua Spencer (2012). Ways of Being. Philosophy Compass 7 (12):910-918.
Ben Caplan (2011). Ontological Superpluralism. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):79-114.
Similar books and articles
J. W. Stoelhorst (2008). The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (4):343-363.
Jason Turner (2010). Ontological Pluralism. Journal of Philosophy 107 (1):5-34.
Matti Eklund (2009). Carnap and Ontological Pluralism. In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. 130--56.
Kris McDaniel (2010). A Return to the Analogy of Being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):688 - 717.
Nicola Ciprotti & Luca Moretti (2009). Logical Pluralism is Compatible with Monism About Metaphysical Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):275-284.
Durant Drake (1926). Discussions: What is a Mind? Ontological Pluralism Versus Ontological Monism. Mind 35 (138):230-236.
Roy T. Cook (2010). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom: A Tour of Logical Pluralism. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):492-504.
Stephanie Ruphy (2011). From Hacking's Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to “Foliated” Pluralism: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1212-1222.
D. Heard (2006). A New Problem for Ontological Emergence. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):55-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #14,662 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #8,988 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?