"Male Logic" and "Women's Intuition" The split in our thinking between "masculine" and "feminine" is probably as old as language itself. Human beings seem..
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The split in our thinking between "masculine" and "feminine" is probably as old as language itself. Human beings seem to have a natural tendency to divide things into pairs: good/bad, light/dark, subject/object and so on. It is not surprising, then, that the male/female or masculine/feminine dichotomy is used to classify things other than men and women. Many languages actually classify all nouns as "masculine" or "feminine" (although not very consistently: for example, the Spanish masculine noun pollo means "hen", while the feminine polla is slang for "penis"). This is perfectly natural; it is part of the way categorisation works in language. This does not, however, mean that it is right. It is probably unimportant whether a table or a chair is thought of as masculine or feminine. It may not even be very important these days whether we think of the sun as male and the moon as female (like the ancient Greeks) or vice versa (like most of the German tribes). However, when we start associating abstract concepts like Reason or Nature with men and women, we run into serious difficulties.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel O. Dugan (1987). Masculine and Feminine Voices: Making Ethical Decisions in the Care of the Dying. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (2):129-140.
John W. Cooper (2000). Supplemental but Not Equal. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):116-125.
Brian D. Earp (2012). The Extinction of Masculine Generics. Journal for Communication and Culture 2 (1):4-19.
Morgan E. Forbes (1997). Questioning Feminine Connection. Hypatia 12 (2):140 - 151.
Maja Mil (1997). The Notion of Feminine in Asian Philosophical Traditions. Asian Philosophy 7 (3):195 – 205.
Cecilia Wee (2003). Mencius, the Feminine Perspective and Impartiality. Asian Philosophy 13 (1):3 – 13.
Mary C. Rawlinson (1982). Psychiatric Discourse and the Feminine Voice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (2):153-178.
Susan Haack (1992). Science 'From a Feminist Perspective'. Philosophy 67 (259):5 - 18.
Sara Mills (1992). Discourse Competence: Or How to Theorize Strong Women Speakers. Hypatia 7 (2):4 - 17.
Lisa Edwards & Carwyn Jones (2007). A Soft Gynocentric Critique of the Practice of Modern Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):346 – 366.
Nel Noddings (1987). Do We Really Want to Produce Good People? Journal of Moral Education 16 (3):177-188.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads29 ( #136,591 of 1,906,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?