David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2007)
Scientists often make surprising claims about things that no one can observe. In physics, chemistry, and molecular biology, scientists can at least experiment on those unobservable entities, but what about researchers in fields such as paleobiology and geology who study prehistory, where no such experimentation is possible? Do scientists discover facts about the distant past or do they, in some sense, make prehistory? Derek Turner argues that this problem has surprising and important consequences for the scientific realism debate. His discussion covers some of the main positions in current philosophy of science - realism, social constructivism, empiricism, and the natural ontological attitude - and shows how they relate to issues in paleobiology and geology. His original and thought-provoking book will be of wide interest to philosophers and scientists alike
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Paleobiology Philosophy Historical geology Philosophy Philosophy Science Geology Paleontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$27.19 used (80% off) $70.66 new (46% off) $129.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.32.R42.T87 2007|
|ISBN(s)||0511289154 052187520X 9780521875202|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adrian Currie (2015). Marsupial Lions and Methodological Omnivory: Function, Success and Reconstruction in Paleobiology. Biology and Philosophy 30 (2):187-209.
Adrian Mitchell Currie (2013). Narratives, Mechanisms and Progress in Historical Science. Synthese 191 (6):1-21.
Derek D. Turner (2014). Philosophical Issues in Recent Paleontology. Philosophy Compass 9 (7):494-505.
Aleta Quinn (forthcoming). Phylogenetic Inference to the Best Explanation and the Bad Lot Argument. Synthese:1-15.
Derek D. Turner (2009). How Much Can We Know About the Causes of Evolutionary Trends? Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):341-357.
Similar books and articles
Rachel Bush (1971). Towards a History of Geology: Proceedings of the New Hampshire Inter-Disciplinary Conference on the History of Geology, September 7–12, 1967. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (2):176-182.
E. B. Davies (2003). Science in the Looking Glass: What Do Scientists Really Know? Oxford University Press.
Miriam Solomon (1992). Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):439-455.
Carol E. Cleland (2002). Methodological and Epistemic Differences Between Historical Science and Experimental Science. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):447-451.
Thomas Raab & Robert Frodeman (2002). What is It Like to Be a Geologist? A Phenomenology of Geology and its Epistemological Implications. Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):69 – 81.
Stathis Psillos (2008). Review of Derek Turner, Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
Richard A. Watson (1966). Is Geology Different: A Critical Discussion of "the Fabric of Geology". Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):172-.
Aviezer Tucker (2009). The Philosophy of Natural History and Historiography Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (4):385-394.
Ben Jeffares (2010). Guessing the Future of the Past. Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):125-142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #107,170 of 1,793,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,170 of 1,793,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?