On the general argument against internalism

Synthese 170 (1):147 - 153 (2009)
I respond to John Greco’s argument that all forms of internalism in epistemology are either false or uninteresting. The paper divides into two sections. First, I explain precisely what internalists and externalists in epistemology disagree over. This puts us in a position to assess whether Greco’s argument succeeds. Second, I present Greco’s argument and offer two objections.
Keywords Epistemology  Epistemic justification  Internalism  Externalism  John Greco
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
James Pryor (2001). Highlights of Recent Epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):95--124.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Michael Veber (2013). I Know I Am Not Gettiered. Analytic Philosophy 54 (4):401-420.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

94 ( #49,492 of 1,926,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

19 ( #33,775 of 1,926,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.