Three theories of nominalized predicates
Studia Logica 44 (2):165 - 186 (1985)
| Abstract | By the term nominalization I mean any process which transforms a predicate or predicate phrase into a noun or noun phrase, e.g. feminine is transformed into feminity. I call these derivative nouns abstract singular terms. Our aim is to provide a model-theoretic interpretation for a formal language which admits the occurrence of such abstract singular terms. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRohit Parikh (1996). Vague Predicates and Language Games. Theoria 11 (3):97-107.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (2005). Denoting Concepts, Reference, and the Logic of Names, Classes as Many, Groups, and Plurals? Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (2):135 - 179.
John Justice (2007). Unified Semantics of Singular Terms. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):363–373.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (1998). Reference in Conceptual Realism. Synthese 114 (2):169-202.
Øystein Linnebo & David Nicolas (2008). Superplurals in English. Analysis 68 (299):186–197.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (1992). Conceptual Realism Versus Quine on Classes and Higher-Order Logic. Synthese 90 (3):379 - 436.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
