David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):69-88 (2005)
Perspicuous representation, Wittgenstein offers, is not another methodology, but it consists in seeing the connections. The Wittgensteinian perspicuous representation is therapeutic. The method he suggests for philosophy is the same method he suggests for social sciences. In both of these cases, he tries to get us to see the confusions we become entangled in when philosophizing and theorizing. In both of these disciplines he warns us not to advance explanatory, metaphysical theories. In this paper, I connect this concern with Wittgensteins critique of Frazer. In criticizing Frazer, Wittgenstein adopts the important part of Spenglers view. Nonetheless, there are differences between Wittgensteins views and those of Spengler; this paper aims to show similarities as well as these differences. The first part of the paper briefly summarizes Frazers views. The second part focuses on Wittgensteins critique of Frazer concerning science and technology. The third part gives an account of his critique regarding method of social sciences and philosophy. The last part concentrates on Wittgensteins critique of Frazer pertaining to the tolerance towards alternative forms of life. Key Words: context-free vacuum evolutionary explanation incommensurability methodology of social sciences perspicuous representation science technology tolerance totem and taboo.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel D. Hutto (2007). Getting Clear About Perspicuous Representations : Wittgenstein, Baker and Fodor. In Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (ed.), Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard Eldridge (1987). Hypotheses, Criterial Claims, and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein's 'Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough'. Philosophical Investigations 10 (3):226-245.
Stanley Cavell (1988). Declining Decline: Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Culture. Inquiry 31 (3):253 – 264.
Jacques Bouveresse (2007). Wittgenstein's Critique of Frazer. Ratio 20 (4):357–376.
P. M. S. Hacker (2001). Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies. Oxford University Press.
Rupert J. Read (2011). Wittgenstein Among the Sciences: Wittgensteinian Investigations Into the "Scientific Method". Ashgate.
Andrzej Orzechowski (1995). A Critical Note on the Editions of Wittgenstein's Remarks on FrazerÂ´ s Golden Bough. Wittgenstein Studien 2 (2).
Stig Børsen Hansen (2010). The Later Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):1013–22.
Frank Cioffi (1998). Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge University Press.
Brian R. Clack (1999). Wittgenstein, Frazer, and Religion. St. Martin's Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #86,368 of 1,101,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?