David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Note to readers: Originally I thought there was a stronger link between Maclaurin and Hume, however I now think it clear that Hume is not taking his mechanics out of Maclaurin’s Account. Although I still have found Maclaurin useful in interpreting Hume, I suspect this draft suffers somewhat from ambivalence. There are still similarities, and possible avenues of influence, arguing that Hume was not ignorant of the new mechanics, but it also becomes clear that he did not understand it: although he adopts the Newtonian measure of force, he misapplies it
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fred Ablondi (2013). Newtonian Vs. Newtonian: Baxter and MacLaurin on the Inactivity of Matter. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):15-23.
Jaime de Salas (1991). Hume and Newton. Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):21-38.
Graciela de Pierris (2006). Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology. Hume Studies 32 (2):277-329.
Mike McLeod & Josh Parsons (2013). Maclaurin and Dyke on Analytic Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):173-178.
Eric Schliesser (2012). Newton and Spinoza: On Motion and Matter (and God, of Course). Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436-458.
James Hill (2012). How Hume Became 'The New Hume': A Developmental Approach. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):163-181.
Scott Black (2011). Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays. Hume Studies 36 (1):3-23.
James E. Force (1987). Hume's Interest in Newton and Science. Hume Studies 13 (2):166-216.
Eugene Sapadin (1997). A Note on Newton, Boyle, and Hume's “Experimental Method”. Hume Studies 23 (2):337-344.
Angela Coventry (2010). Critical Review of Recent Introductory Works on Hume. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (2):217-225.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
James Maclaurin & Kim Sterelny (2008). What is Biodiversity? University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads9 ( #168,552 of 1,140,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?