Comments on “explaining sense perception: A scholastic challenge” by Alison J. Simmons
Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):277 - 281 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMartin E. Lean (1953/1973). Sense-Perception And Matter: A Critical Analysis Of C. D. Broad's Theory Of Perception. Ny: Humanities Press.
William Cooney (1985). Some Comments on the Sense-Datum Theory and the Argument From Illusion. Dialogue 28 (October):8-15.
Jody Graham (1997). Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
Alison Simmons (2003). Descartes on the Cognitive Structure of Sensory Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):549–579.
Tim Crane, The Problem of Perception. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Raffaella De Rosa (2007). A Teleological Account of Cartesian Sensations? Synthese 156 (2):311 - 336.
Alison Simmons (1999). Are Cartesian Sensations Representational? Noûs 33 (3):347-369.
Alison Simmons (2003). Spatial Perception From a Cartesian Point of View. Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):395-423.
Alison Simmons (1994). Explaining Sense Perception: A Scholastic Challenge. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):257 - 275.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
