Why the vague need not be higher-order vague

Mind 103 (409):43-45 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is higher-order vagueness a real phenomenon? Dominic Hyde (1994) claims that it is, and that it is part and parcel of vagueness itself. According to Hyde, any genuinely vague predicate must also be higher-order vague. His argument for this view is unsound, however. The purpose of this note is to expose the fallacy, and to make some related observations on the vague, the higher-order vague, and the vaguely vague.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
359 (#50,495)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Tye
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

‘Vague’ at Higher Orders.Ivan Hu - 2017 - Mind 126 (504):1189-1216.
Qualia and vagueness.Anthony Everett - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):205-226.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references