David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 28 (3):483-498 (2013)
Luce Irigaray's work does not present an obvious resource for projects seeking to reclaim women in the history of philosophy. Indeed, many authors introduce their reclamation project with an argument against conceptions, attributed to Irigaray or “French feminists” more generally, that the feminine is the excluded other of discourse. These authors claim that if the feminine is the excluded other of discourse, then we must conclude that even if women have written philosophy they have not given voice to feminine subjectivity; therefore, reclamation is a futile project. In this essay, I argue against such conclusions. Rather, I argue, Irigaray's work requires that philosophy be transformed through the reclamation of women's writing. She gives us a method of reclamation for the most difficult cases: those in which we have no record of women's writing. Irigaray offers this method through an engagement with the character of Diotima in Plato's Symposium. The method Irigaray demonstrates is reclamation as love
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Luce Irigaray (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Cornell University Press.
Luce Irigaray (1985). Speculum of the Other Woman. Cornell University Press.
Luce Irigaray (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One. Cornell University Press.
Penelope Deutscher (1997). Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy. Routledge.
Andrea Nye (1989). The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato's Symposium. Hypatia 3 (3):45 - 61.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Penelope Deutscher (1994). "The Only Diabolical Thing About Women...": Luce Irigaray on Divinity. Hypatia 9 (4):88 - 111.
Luce Irigaray (1992). Je, Tu, Nous: Toward a Culture of Difference. New York ;Routledge.
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Mary Beth Mader (2003). All Too Familiar: Luce Irigaray's Recent Thought on Sexuation and Generation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):367-390.
Elizabeth Hirsh, Gary A. Olson & Gaëton Brulotte (1995). "Je-Luce Irigaray": A Meeting with Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 10 (2):93 - 114.
Shaun O'Dwyer (2006). The Unacknowledged Socrates in the Works of Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 21 (2):28-44.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Karen Green (2002). The Other as Another Other. Hypatia 17 (4):1-15.
Margaret Whitford (1991). Irigaray's Body Symbolic. Hypatia 6 (3):97 - 110.
Serene J. Khader (2008). When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 48-74.
Diana J. Fuss (1989). "Essentially Speaking": Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence. Hypatia 3 (3):62 - 80.
Added to index2012-05-30
Total downloads13 ( #279,935 of 1,911,320 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,320 )
How can I increase my downloads?