David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171 (2006)
Anselm defines free will as “the ability to keep uprightness of will for the sake of uprightness itself ” rather than as the ability to sin or not sin. I fulfill two objectives pertaining to his definition. First, I show that his definition should be interpreted as a hierarchical account of free will, one that emphasizes the idea that an agent’s will is free if she is able to have the will she wants to have. The interpretationis based on Anselm’s hierarchical account of the structure of the will. Secondly, I show that Anselm’s theory of ultimate responsibility, when added to the hierarchical interpretation of his definition, provides an answer to one of the primary objections to the hierarchical approach to free will
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Katherin A. Rogers (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Anselm (1977). St. Anselm's Treatise on Free Will: The Booke of Seynt Anselme Which Treatith of Free Wylle Translated in to Englysche: A Facsimile of the Complete Text of a Recently Discovered 15th C. Manuscript. Toucan Press.
Katherin A. Rogers (2005). Anselm on Eudaemonism and the Hierarchical Structure of Moral Choice. Religious Studies 41 (3):249-268.
Robert H. Kane (ed.) (2001). Free Will. Blackwell.
Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser (2005). Anselm on Truth. In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press 204-221.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Tomas Ekenberg (2005). Free Will and Free Action in Anselm of Canterbury. History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (4):301 - 318.
Jasper Hopkins (1983). Anselm on Freedom and the Will. Philosophy Research Archives 9:471-493.
M. J. Wolf, K. W. Miller & F. S. Grodzinsky (2009). On the Meaning of Free Software. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):279-286.
Katherin A. Rogers (2011). Anselm Against McCann On God and Sin. Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):397-415.
Phillip E. Devine (1986). On the Definition of “Religion”. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.
Hugh J. McCann (2009). God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #280,157 of 1,792,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,816 )
How can I increase my downloads?