David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):528-545 (2002)
According to the concept of direct parameter specification, nonconsciously registered information can be processed to the extent that it matches currently active intentions of a person. This prediction was tested and confirmed in the current study. Masked visual information provided by peripheral cues led to reaction time effects only if the information specified one of the required responses . Information delivered by the same masked cues that did not match the intentions was not used. However, the same information influenced RT if it was provided by visible cues . The results suggest that the processing of nonconsciously registered information is flexible because it is susceptible to the changing intentions of a person. Yet, these processes are apparently restricted, as nonconsciously registered information cannot be used as easily for purposes not corresponding to the currently active intentions as better visible information
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Erin K. Cressman, Melanie Y. Lam, Ian M. Franks, James T. Enns & Romeo Chua (2013). Unconscious and Out of Control: Subliminal Priming is Insensitive to Observer Expectations. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):716-728.
Similar books and articles
Shah Khalid, Peter König & Ulrich Ansorge (2011). Sensitivity of Different Measures of the Visibility of Masked Primes: Influences of Prime–Response and Prime–Target Relations. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1473-1488.
Barbara Applebaum (1997). Good Liberal Intentions Are Not Enough! Racism, Intentions and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Moral Education 26 (4):409-421.
PW Sammarco (2008). Journal Visibility, Self-Citation, and Reference Limits: Influences on Impact Factor and Author Performance Review. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (2):121-125.
Anna-Lisa Cohen, Ute C. Bayer, Alexander Jaudas & Peter M. Gollwitzer, Self-Regulatory Strategy and Executive Control : Implementation Intentions Modulate Task Switching and Simon Task Performance.
Gwen E. Jones & Michael J. Kavanagh (1996). An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):511 - 523.
István Aranyosi (forthcoming). Margins of Me: A Personal Story (Chapter 1 of The Peripheral Mind). In The Peripheral Mind. Philosophy of Mind and the Peripheral Nervous System. OUP.
Chieh-Peng Lin (2006). To Help or Not to Help: Understanding the Helping Intentions From a Mediating Perspective of Social Network Ties. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):175 - 182.
Michael Snodgrass, Howard Shevrin & Michael Kopka (1993). The Mediation of Intentional Judgments by Unconscious Perceptions: The Influences of Task Strategy, Task Preference, Word Meaning, and Motivation. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (3):169-193.
Morten Ougaard (1982). Some Remarks Concerning Peripheral Capitalism and the Peripheral State. Science and Society 46 (4):385 - 404.
Mike Oaksford (1998). Discussion Task Demands and Revising Probabilities in the Selection Task: A Comment on Green, Over, and Pyne. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):179 – 186.
David W. Green David, E. Over Robin & A. Pyne (1997). Probability and Choice in the Selection Task. Thinking and Reasoning 3 (3):209 – 235.
Alfred R. Mele (2008). Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing. Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Liesbeth Flobbe, Rineke Verbrugge, Petra Hendriks & Irene Krämer (2008). Children's Application of Theory of Mind in Reasoning and Language. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (4):417-442.
Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater & Becki Grainger (1999). Probabilistic Effects in Data Selection. Thinking and Reasoning 5 (3):193 – 243.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads1 ( #498,231 of 1,410,002 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #176,758 of 1,410,002 )
How can I increase my downloads?