David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper, I will show that Sherlock Holmes was a good logician, according to the standard of the 19th century, both in his character and knowledge (sections 2 and 3). Holmes, in all probability, knew William Stanley Jevons’ clarification of deductive reasoning in terms of “logical alphabets” (section 4). And in view of his use of “analytic-synthetic” distinction and “analytic reasoning,” I will argue that Holmes knew rather well philosophy too, as far as logic and methodology are concerned (section 5). Further, I have argued that Holmes introduced new twists (presumably, following Jevons) into analytic reasoning: application to reasoning as regards causal sequences, and probabilistic elimination of hypotheses (sections 6 and 7). Also, in this context, I will clarify the significance of Holmes’ metaphor of the “little attic”: without fine assortment in your brain, it is hard to devise promising hypotheses (section 8). Finally, presenting a simple model of probabilistic inference, which became prevalent in the 19th century (section 9), I claim that the essence of Holmes’ reasoning consists of probabilistic inferences, “balance probabilities and choose the most likely,” which is nothing but probabilistic elimination of hypotheses in the light of evidence. I also argue that my claim fits in well with the text of Holmes stories (section 10).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest Holmes (1989). The Holmes Papers: The Philosophy of Ernest Holmes. South Bay Church of Religious Science.
Takashi Yagisawa (2001). Against Creationism in Fiction. Noûs 35 (s15):153-172.
Matti Sintonen (2004). Reasoning to Hypotheses: Where Do Questions Come? Foundations of Science 9 (3):249-266.
Wendy S. Parker (2008). Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Wulf Rehder (1979). Sherlock Holmes ‐ Philosopher Detective. Inquiry 22 (1-4):441-457.
Rita C. Manning (1987). Why Sherlock Holmes Can't Be Replaced by an Expert System. Philosophical Studies 51 (January):19-28.
Thomas A. Sebeok (1980). "You Know My Method": A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Gaslight Publications.
Added to index2010-04-18
Total downloads72 ( #66,005 of 1,940,948 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,625 of 1,940,948 )
How can I increase my downloads?