David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):201 - 227 (2010)
The struggle to delineate the relationship between theology and logic flourished in the thirteenth century and culminated in two condemnations in early 1277, one in Paris and the other in Oxford. To see how much and what kind of effect ecclesiastical actions such as condemnations and prohibitions to teach had on the development of logic in the Middle Ages, we investigate the events leading up to the 1277 actions, the condemned propositions, and the parts of these condemnations connected to modal and temporal logic specifically. We show that because of the specific motivations late thirteenth-century and fourteenth-century logicians had when working in modal and temporal logic, the effect of the 1277 condemnations on the development of those branches was much smaller than might have been supposed.
|Keywords||Ecclesiastical condemnation Heresy Modal logic Robert Kilwardby Stephen Tempier Temporal logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Arthur N. Prior (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford, Clarendon P..
John F. Wippel (1995). Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277. Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):233-272.
Calvin G. Normore (1995). Who Was Condemned in 1277? Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):273-281.
Hans Thijssen, Condemnation of 1277. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Seiki Akama, Yasunori Nagata & Chikatoshi Yamada (2008). Three-Valued Temporal Logic Q T and Future Contingents. Studia Logica 88 (2):215-231.
Robert Demolombe, Andreas Herzig & Ivan Varzinczak (2003). Regression in Modal Logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 13 (2):165-185.
John F. Wippel (2001). David Piché on the Condemnation of 1277. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):597-624.
Volker Peckhaus (1999). 19th Century Logic Between Philosophy and Mathematics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):433-450.
Risto Vilkko (2007). The Problematic Reconstruction of the Development of Modern Logic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:31-35.
Augustine Casiday (2012). On Heresy in Modern Patristic Scholarship: The Case of Evagrius Ponticus. Heythrop Journal 53 (2):241-252.
John P. Burgess (2009). Philosophical Logic. Princeton University Press.
Jeremiah Hackett (1997). Roger Bacon, Aristotle, and the Parisian Condemnations of 1270, 1277. Vivarium 35 (2):283-314.
Leland E. Wilshire (1974). Were the Oxford Condemnations of 1277 Directed Against Aquinas? New Scholasticism 48 (1):125-132.
Added to index2010-02-20
Total downloads61 ( #73,687 of 1,934,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?