David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):201 - 227 (2010)
The struggle to delineate the relationship between theology and logic flourished in the thirteenth century and culminated in two condemnations in early 1277, one in Paris and the other in Oxford. To see how much and what kind of effect ecclesiastical actions such as condemnations and prohibitions to teach had on the development of logic in the Middle Ages, we investigate the events leading up to the 1277 actions, the condemned propositions, and the parts of these condemnations connected to modal and temporal logic specifically. We show that because of the specific motivations late thirteenth-century and fourteenth-century logicians had when working in modal and temporal logic, the effect of the 1277 condemnations on the development of those branches was much smaller than might have been supposed.
|Keywords||Ecclesiastical condemnation Heresy Modal logic Robert Kilwardby Stephen Tempier Temporal logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel Angelo Philip[from old catalog] Callus (1955). The Condemnation of St. Thomas at Oxford. London]Blackfriars.
William J. Courtenay (1994). Dominicans and Suspect Opinion in the Thirteenth Century: The Cases of Stephen of Venizy, Peter of Tarentaise, and the Articles of 1270 and 1271. Vivarium 32 (2):186-195.
Malcolm de Mowbray (2006). TheDe Aeternitate Mundiof Boethius of Dacia and the Paris Condemnation of 1277. Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 73 (2):201-253.
Bernard G. Dod (1982). Aristoteles latinus. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge. 45--79.
Isabel Iribarren (2001). 'Responsio Secundum Thomam' and the Search for an Early Thomistic School. Vivarium 39 (2):255-296.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeremiah Hackett (1997). Roger Bacon, Aristotle, and the Parisian Condemnations of 1270, 1277. Vivarium 35 (2):283-314.
John P. Burgess (2009). Philosophical Logic. Princeton University Press.
Augustine Casiday (2012). On Heresy in Modern Patristic Scholarship: The Case of Evagrius Ponticus. Heythrop Journal 53 (2):241-252.
Risto Vilkko (2007). The Problematic Reconstruction of the Development of Modern Logic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:31-35.
Volker Peckhaus (1999). 19th Century Logic Between Philosophy and Mathematics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):433-450.
John F. Wippel (2001). David Piché on the Condemnation of 1277. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):597-624.
Robert Demolombe, Andreas Herzig & Ivan Varzinczak (2003). Regression in Modal Logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 13 (2):165-185.
Seiki Akama, Yasunori Nagata & Chikatoshi Yamada (2008). Three-Valued Temporal Logic Q T and Future Contingents. Studia Logica 88 (2):215 - 231.
Leland E. Wilshire (1974). Were the Oxford Condemnations of 1277 Directed Against Aquinas? New Scholasticism 48 (1):125-132.
Added to index2010-02-20
Total downloads45 ( #36,796 of 1,101,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,124 of 1,101,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?