Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):167 - 175 (2008)
|Abstract||Small and medium-sized firms form 90% of the worldwide population of businesses. However, it has been argued that given their smaller scale of operations, resource access constraints and lower visibility, smaller firms are less likely to participate in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. This article examines the different economic motivations of firms with varying combinations of visibility, resource access and scale of operations. Arguments are presented to propose that in terms of visibility, resource access and operating scale, very small and very large firms are equally motivated to participate in CSR. However, the motivational bases for CSR participation are likely to be different. Medium-sized firms are the least motivated. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between firm size and CSR participation. This study contributes towards resolution of the long-standing debate on the effects of firm size on CSR participation, and highlights the importance of considering configurations of firm characteristics in the study of CSR outcomes. In conclusion, cautions are raised against the broad categorization of firms, without adequate attention to the underlying dimensions of such categorizations|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wenjing Li & Ran Zhang (forthcoming). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence From China. Journal of Business Ethics.
Won Yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang & Aleksey Martynov (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence From Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):283-297.
Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati (2009). Formal Vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence From Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 85:339 - 353.
Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):351-383.
Manuel Castelo Branco & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):111 - 132.
Lutz Preuss & Jack Perschke (2010). Slipstreaming the Larger Boats: Social Responsibility in Medium-Sized Businesses. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4).
Joyce Falkenberg & Petter Brunsæl (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Advantage or a Strategic Necessity? Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):9-16.
Liangrong Zu & Lina Song (forthcoming). Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From China. Journal of Business Ethics.
Francesco Perrini, Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati (2007). CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence From Italy. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):285 - 300.
Jan Lepoutre & Aimé Heene (2006). Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):257 - 273.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #88,037 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?