David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440 (1996)
The tendency to attribute foundationalist ambitions to the Vienna Circle has long obscured our view of its attempted revolution in philosophy. The present paper makes the case for a consistently epistemologically anti-foundationalist interpretation of all three of the Circle's main protagonists: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. Corresponding to the intellectual fault lines within the Circle, two ways of going about the radical reorientation of the pursuit of philosophy will then be distinguished and the contemporary potential of Carnap's and Neurath's project explored.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2002). Stroud's Carnap. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):276-302.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Mormann (2012). A Virtual Debate in Exile: Cassirer and the Vienna Circle After 1933. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16:149 - 167.
Thomas E. Uebel (2008). On the Production, History, and Aspects of the Reception of the Vienna Circle's Manifesto. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):70-102.
Thomas Uebel (2010). What's Right About Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis: A Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.
Maria Carla Galavotti (ed.) (2004). Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
James O. Young (1991). Coherence, Anti-Realism and the Vienna Circle. Synthese 86 (3):467 - 482.
Thomas E. Uebel (ed.) (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate. Rodopi.
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):14-24.
Thomas Oberdan (1998). The Vienna Circle's 'Anti-Foundationalism'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):297-308.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #82,734 of 1,699,438 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,438 )
How can I increase my downloads?