Carnap's ramseyfications defended

Abstract
This paper seeks to evaluate the potential of the Newman objection to function as an immanent critique of Carnap's use of the Ramsey method of regimenting scientific theories. Stress is laid on the distinctive way in which ramseyfications are used by Carnap to formulate the analytic/synthetic distinction for the theoretical language and on the difference between the ontological and the epistemic readings of the Newman objection. While the former reading of the Newman objection is rejected as trading on an assumption that Carnap did not share, the latter is accepted as critical. It is argued to turn on overlooking that the Ramsey sentence constitutes an idealization concerning which our normal expectations of what theories are like are bound to be frustrated. This idealisation need not reflect Carnap's considered view but can be regarded as adopted solely for the project of semantic explication. The distinctions drawn in the course of the argument also help to motivate Carnap's abstention from the discourse of realism and its denial
Keywords Rudolf Carnap  Ramsey sentences  Carnap sentences  Analytic/synthetic distinction  Empirical adequacy  Underdetermination
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,788
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Carnap (1961). On the Use of Hilbert's-Operator in Scientific Theories'. In Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua & [From Old Catalog] (eds.), Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics. Jerusalem, Magnes Press, Hebrew University;. 156--164.
Rudolf Carnap (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
William Craig (1953). On Axiomatizability Within a System. Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):30-32.

View all 28 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Eric J. Loomis (2006). Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-28

Total downloads

31 ( #55,268 of 1,099,035 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,035 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.