David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 67 (3):150 (2000)
Logical Empiricism is commonly regarded as uninterested in, if not hostile to sociological investigations of science. This paper reconstructs the views of Otto Neurath and Philipp Frank on the legitimacy and relevance of sociological investigations of theory choice. It is argued that while there obtains a surprising degree of convergence between their programmatic pronouncements and the Strong Programme, the two types of project nevertheless remain distinct. The key to this differences lies in the different assessment of a supposed dilemma facing post-Mertonian sociologists of science
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 2. The Left Vienna Circle, Disciplinary History, and Feminist Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):167-174.
Philip Mirowski (2004). The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):283-326.
Thomas Uebel (2010). What's Right About Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis: A Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.
Thomas Uebel (2005). Political Philosophy of Science in Logical Empiricism: The Left Vienna Circle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):754-773.
Thomas Uebel (2012). But is It Sociology of Knowledge? Wilhelm Jerusalem's “Sociology of Cognition” in Context. Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):5-37.
Similar books and articles
J. O'Neill (2003). Unified Science as Political Philosophy: Positivism, Pluralism and Liberalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):575-596.
Thomas E. Uebel (1995). Otto Neurath's Idealist Inheritance. Synthese 103 (1):87 - 121.
John O'neill (2006). Knowledge, Planning, and Markets: A Missing Chapter in the Socialist Calculation Debates. Economics and Philosophy 22 (1):55-78.
T. Mormann (1997). Review. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. N Cartwright, J Cat, L Fleck & TE Uebel. Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle Protocol Sentence Debate. TE Uebel. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):306-309.
George A. Reisch (2001). Against a Third Dogma of Logical Empiricism: Otto Neurath and "Unpredictability in Principle". International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):199 – 209.
Otto Neurath (1946). The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4):496-508.
Nikola Nottelmann (2006). Otto Neurath on the Structure of Protocol Sentences; a New Approach to an Interpretative Puzzle. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (1):165 - 186.
Irving Louis Horowitz (1963). Establishment Sociology: The Value of Being Value-Free. Inquiry 6 (1-4):129 – 140.
Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, Otto Neurath & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.) (1996). Logical Empiricism at its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. Garland Pub..
Kathleen Okruhlik (2004). Logical Empiricism, Feminism, and Neurath's Auxiliary Motive. Hypatia 19 (1):48-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #76,983 of 1,692,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,992 of 1,692,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?