Erkenntnis 78 (3):523-546 (2013)
|Abstract||This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the “logic of science”) supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the “behavioristics of science”). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap’s formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris’s proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Uebel (2012). The Bipartite Conception of Metatheory and the Dialectical Conception of Explication. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Charles Sayward (1975). Pragmatics and Indexicality. Pragmatics Microfiche 1 (4):D5-D11.
Michael Friedman (2011). Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism Without Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Synthese 180 (2):249 - 263.
Thomas Mormann (2006). Carnap's Logical Empiricism, Values, and American Pragmatism. Journal of General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):127 - 146.
Thomas Oberdan (1990). Positivism and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:25 - 37.
Thomas Mormann (2007). Carnap's Logical Empiricism, Values, and American Pragmatism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):127 - 146.
William H. Berge (1995). Carnap and Translational Indeterminacy. Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Eric J. Loomis (2006). Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Charles Sayward (1974). The Received Distinction Between Pragmatics, Syntax and Semantics. Foundations of Language 11:97-104.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1955). A Note on Carnap's Meaning Analysis. Philosophical Studies 6 (6):87-88.
Stathis Psillos (2000). Carnap, the Ramsey-Sentence and Realistic Empiricism. Erkenntnis 52 (2):253-279.
Johanna Seibt (1997). The 'Umbau' - From Constitution Theory to Constructional Ontology. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):305 - 348.
Georg Schiemer (2013). Carnap's Early Semantics. Erkenntnis 78 (3):487-522.
Wolfgang Kienzler (2012). Carnap's Conception of Philosophy. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2011-12-04
Total downloads24 ( #57,763 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,265 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?