David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221 (2010)
This paper rejects as unfounded a recent criticism of research on the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle and the claim that it sported a political philosophy of science. The demand for ‘specific, local periodized claims’ is turned against the critic. It is shown (i) that certain criticisms of Red Vienna’s leading party cannot be transferred to the members of the Circle involved in popular education, nor can criticism of Carnap’s Aufbau be transferred to Neurath’s unified science project; (ii) that neither with regard to Carnap nor to Neurath does the criticism raise points that either engage with the thesis proposed or stand up to closer scrutiny; (iii) that the main thesis attacked is just what I had warned the claim that the Vienna Circle had a political philosophy of science should not be understood as. The question whether theirs is ‘political enough’ today can and should be discussed without distortion of the historical record
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jürgen Habermas (1978/1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann Educational.
A. J. Ayer (1936). Language, Truth and Logic. London, V. Gollancz, Ltd..
Rudolf Carnap (1967). The Logical Structure of the World. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Don A. Howard (2003). Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury. In Logical Empiricism in North America. University of Minnesota Press
Citations of this work BETA
M. Seidel (2016). Changing Society by Scientific Investigations? The Unexpected Shared Ground Between Early Sociology of Knowledge and the Vienna Circle. Foundations of Science 21 (1):117-128.
Donata Romizi (2012). The Vienna Circle’s “Scientific World-Conception”: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):205-242.
Similar books and articles
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):14-24.
Thomas E. Uebel (1996). Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle's Revolution in Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.
Thomas Ernst Uebel (ed.) (1991). Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
T. E. Uebel (ed.) (1991). Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Heiner Rutte (1991). The Philosopher Otto Neurath. In Thomas Ernst Uebel (ed.), Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers 81--94.
Angela Potochnik & Audrey Yap (2006). Revisiting Galison's 'Aufbau/Bauhaus' in Light of Neurath's Philosophical Projects. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):469-488.
Thomas Uebel (2013). Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception. Erkenntnis 78 (3):523-546.
Thomas E. Uebel (ed.) (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate. Rodopi.
Nikola Nottelmann (2006). Otto Neurath on the Structure of Protocol Sentences; a New Approach to an Interpretative Puzzle. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):165 - 186.
Hans Hahn, Otto Neurath & Rudolf Carnap (1929). The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle.
T. Mormann (1997). Review. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. N Cartwright, J Cat, L Fleck & TE Uebel. Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle Protocol Sentence Debate. TE Uebel. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):306-309.
T. A. Ryckman (1995). Book Review:Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate Thomas E. Uebel. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 62 (2):335-.
Thomas Uebel (2009). Carnap's Logical Syntax in the Context of the Vienna Circle. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan
Maria Carla Galavotti (ed.) (2004). Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads44 ( #90,818 of 1,790,186 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #123,151 of 1,790,186 )
How can I increase my downloads?