David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (3):305-394 (2001)
The aim of this article is to analyse the relation between the second law of thermodynamics and the so-called arrow of time. For this purpose, a number of different aspects in this arrow of time are distinguished, in particular those of time-reversal (non-)invariance and of (ir)reversibility. Next I review versions of the second law in the work of Carnot, Clausius, Kelvin, Planck, Gibbs, Caratheodory and Lieb and Yngvason, and investigate their connection with these aspects of the arrow of time. It is shown that this connection varies a great deal along with these formulations of the second law. According to the famous formulation by Planck, the second law expresses the irreversibility of natural processes. But in many other formulations irreversibility or even time-reversal non-invariance plays no role. I therefore argue for the view that the second law has nothing to do with the arrow of time.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marij van Strien (2013). The Nineteenth Century Conflict Between Mechanism and Irreversibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 44 (3):191-205.
James Ladyman, Stuart Presnell & Anthony J. Short (2008). The Use of the Information-Theoretic Entropy in Thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (2):315-324.
Bradford Skow (2011). Does Temperature Have a Metric Structure? Philosophy of Science 78 (3):472-489.
James Ladyman, Stuart Presnell, Anthony J. Short & Berry Groisman (2007). The Connection Between Logical and Thermodynamic Irreversibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (1):58-79.
James Ladyman & Katie Robertson (2013). Landauer Defended: Reply to Norton. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 44 (3):263-271.
Similar books and articles
R. H., Uffink &Unknown & J. (2001). The Origins of Time-Asymmetry in Thermodynamics: The Minus First Law. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (4):525-538.
Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi (2005). Time's Arrow and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):223 – 243.
Étienne Klein (2007). About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time. Foundations of Science 12 (3):203-221.
Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi, Time-Reversal Invariance and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics.
Jill North (2011). Time in Thermodynamics. In Criag Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford. 312--350.
Owen Maroney (2010). Does a Computer Have an Arrow of Time? Foundations of Physics 40 (2):205-238.
Domenico Giulini, On the Statistical Viewpoint Concerning the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics - OR - a Reminder on the Ehrenfests' Urm Model.
Orly Shenker & Meir Hemmo (2011). Introduction to the Philosophy of Statistical Mechanics: Can Probability Explain the Arrow of Time in the Second Law of Thermodynamics? Philosophy Compass 6 (9):640-651.
Harvey R. Brown & Jos Uffink (2001). The Origins of Time-Asymmetry in Thermodynamics: The Minus First Law. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (4):525-538.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #30,689 of 1,693,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #26,512 of 1,693,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?