David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2):249-262 (2012)
Accounts of act individuation have attempted to capture peoples’ pre-theoretic intuitions. Donald Davidson has argued that a multitude of action descriptions designate only one act, while Alvin Goldman has averred that each action description refers to a distinct act. Following on recent empirical studies, I subject these accounts of act individuation to experimentation. The data indicate that people distinguish between actions differently depending upon the moral valence of the outcomes. Thus, the assumption that a single account of act individuation applies invariantly seems mistaken.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Fred Adams & Annie Steadman (2004). Intentional Action in Ordinary Language: Core Concept or Pragmatic Understanding? Analysis 64 (2):173–181.
Fred Adams & Annie Steadman (2004). Intentional Action and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic. Analysis 64 (3):268 - 276.
G. E. M. Anscombe (1957/2000). Intention. Harvard University Press.
Fiery Cushman & Alfred Mele (2008). Intentional Action : Two-and-a-Half Folk Concepts? In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press 171.
Donald Davidson (1971). Agent, Action, and Reason. In Robert Binkley, Richard Bronaugh & Ausonio Marras (eds.), Agent, Action, and Reason. University of Toronto Press
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Constantine Sandis (2012). The Things We Do and Why We Do Them. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jay Alan Smith (1978). Goldman on Act Individuation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (3):230-241.
Jay Alan Smith (1978). Goldman on Act Individuation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (3):230 – 241.
Rolf Gruner (1976). On the Action of Social Groups. Inquiry 19 (1-4):443 – 454.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2011). Action-Individuation and Doxastic Agency. Theoria 77 (4):312-332.
David-Hillel Ruben (1999). Act Individuation: The Cambridge Theory. Analysis 59 (4):276–283.
Alicia Juarrero Roque (1983). Does Level Generation Always Generate Act-Tokens? Philosophy Research Archives 9:177-192.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Teleology, Consequentialism, and the Past. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Christopher M. Brown (2001). Aquinas on the Individuation of Non-Living Substances. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:237-254.
Tyler Cowen (2006). The Epistemic Problem Does Not Refute Consequentialism. Utilitas 18 (04):383-.
Karl Pfeifer (1985). A Consideration of Modifications to the Multiplying Account. Philosophy Research Archives 11:141-154.
George Herbert Mead (1938). The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, Ill.,The University of Chicago Press.
Douglas Lackey (1988). Modes of Individuation in Art. Philosophy Research Archives 14:567-580.
Added to index2012-04-26
Total downloads62 ( #38,022 of 1,700,240 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,079 of 1,700,240 )
How can I increase my downloads?