No impediment to solidity as impediment
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
ABSTRACT: Quassim Cassam (1997) accepts the standard account of solidity, according to which, if S feels x as solid, then S feels x as an imediment to his movement. Recently, Martin Fricke and Paul Snowdon (2003) have presented a battery of counter-examples designed to show that S may feel x as solid and as exerting a pressure that supports or facilitates his movement. In this note, I defend the standard account against Fricke and Snowdon’s attack. Integral to this defense is a distinction between two (sometimes overlapping) ways in which S may feel x as an impediment to his movement: as an influence on a movement state of S, or as an obstacle to the achievement of a goal that requires movement. After demonstrating the primacy of the former sense, I argue that Fricke and Snowdon’s counter-examples only undermine a version of the standard account that glosses ‘impediment’ as an obstacle to the achievement of a goal that requires movement
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephan Blatti (2006). No Impediment to Solidity as Impediment. Metaphysica 7 (1):35-41.
Paul St Amour (2003). Cultural Pluralism and the Limitations of the Classicist Conception of Culture. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:259-271.
Roland E. Kidwell, Franz W. Kellermanns & Kimberly A. Eddleston (2012). Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the “Fredo Effect”. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):503-517.
Irena Martínková (2011). Anthropos as Kinanthropos: Heidegger and PatoČka on Human Movement. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):217 - 230.
Peggy J. Parks (2012). The Green Movement. Referencepoint Press.
Marshall B. Kapp (1999). Commentary: Anxieties as a Legal Impediment to the Doctor-Proxy Relationship. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27 (1):69-73.
Frederick R. Prete (1990). The Conundrum of the Honey Bees: One Impediment to the Publication of Darwin's Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 23 (2):271 - 290.
David P. Lang (2003). Aquinas's Impediment Argument for the Spirituality of the Human Intellect. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):107-124.
G. Schiavella (1966). The Impediment of male impotence with special application to Paraplegia. Augustinianum 6 (1):135-135.
Martin F. Fricke & Paul Snowdon (2003). Solidity and Impediment. Analysis 63 (279):173–178.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?