No impediment to solidity as impediment
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
ABSTRACT: Quassim Cassam (1997) accepts the standard account of solidity, according to which, if S feels x as solid, then S feels x as an imediment to his movement. Recently, Martin Fricke and Paul Snowdon (2003) have presented a battery of counter-examples designed to show that S may feel x as solid and as exerting a pressure that supports or facilitates his movement. In this note, I defend the standard account against Fricke and Snowdon’s attack. Integral to this defense is a distinction between two (sometimes overlapping) ways in which S may feel x as an impediment to his movement: as an influence on a movement state of S, or as an obstacle to the achievement of a goal that requires movement. After demonstrating the primacy of the former sense, I argue that Fricke and Snowdon’s counter-examples only undermine a version of the standard account that glosses ‘impediment’ as an obstacle to the achievement of a goal that requires movement
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Stephan Blatti (2006). No Impediment to Solidity as Impediment. Metaphysica 7 (1):35-41.
Paul St Amour (2003). Cultural Pluralism and the Limitations of the Classicist Conception of Culture. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:259-271.
Roland E. Kidwell, Franz W. Kellermanns & Kimberly A. Eddleston (2012). Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the “Fredo Effect”. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):503-517.
Irena Martínková (2011). Anthropos as Kinanthropos: Heidegger and PatoČka on Human Movement. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):217 - 230.
Peggy J. Parks (2012). The Green Movement. Referencepoint Press.
Marshall B. Kapp (1999). Commentary: Anxieties as a Legal Impediment to the Doctor-Proxy Relationship. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (1):69-73.
Frederick R. Prete (1990). The Conundrum of the Honey Bees: One Impediment to the Publication of Darwin's Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 23 (2):271 - 290.
David P. Lang (2003). Aquinas's Impediment Argument for the Spirituality of the Human Intellect. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (01):107-124.
G. Schiavella (1966). The Impediment of male impotence with special application to Paraplegia. Augustinianum 6 (1):135-135.
Martin F. Fricke & Paul Snowdon (2003). Solidity and Impediment. Analysis 63 (279):173–178.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?