Relevance in the law: A logical perspective
Author unknown
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJ. J. Moreso (1996). On Relevance and Justification of Legal Decisions. Erkenntnis 44 (1):73 - 100.
Adolph Julius Rodenbeck (1925/1992). The Anatomy of the Law: A Logical Presentation of the Parts of the Body of the Law. F.B. Rothman.
Alberto Bondolfi (2000). Ethics, Law and Legislation: The Institutionalisation of Moral Reflection. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):27-37.
Yoav Shoham (2009). Logical Theories of Intention and the Database Perspective. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6).
L. Jonathan Cohen (1994). Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance. Synthese 101 (2):171 - 185.
David Howarth (2000). On the Question, “What is Law?”. Res Publica 6 (3).
James P. Delgrande & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (1998). A Formal Analysis of Relevance. Erkenntnis 49 (2):137-173.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
