David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2 (2):41-53 (2010)
What is properly Emersonian about moral perfectionism? Perhaps the best answer is: not much. Stanley Cavell's signature concept, which claims close kinship to Emerson's ethical philosophy, seems upon careful examination to be rather far removed from it. Once we get past the broad, unproblematic appeals to Emerson's “unattained but attainable self,” and consider the specific content and implications of perfectionism, the differences between the two thinkers become too substantive – and too fraught with serious misunderstandings – to be ignored. It is above all Cavell's complete disregard for the Emersonian “moral sentiment” that jeopardizes his claim to be a continuator of Emerson's legacy in ethical philosophy. I would not deny that Cavell's own work stands as an extraordinary contribution to contemporary ethics. Nor would I dispute his title as the living philosopher who has done more than any other to restore Emerson to his rightful place in the history of American philosophy, as a thinker worthy of the highest consideration. Still less would I discount the boldness and originality of Cavell's readings of Emerson. What I am contesting, rather, is the propriety of attaching the label “Emersonian” to the notion of perfectionism, especially in view of its strong anti-metaphysical bias. The Emerson canon provides ample grounds for rejecting Cavell's claim as largely unsubstantiated and in a number of crucial ways inconsistent with the moral sentiment's firm grounding of ethics in ontology.
|Keywords||Emerson and Cavell Emerson's Metaphysics Emerson's Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stanley Cavell (1988). Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism: The Carus Lectures, 1988. University Of Chicago Press.
Stanley Cavell (1988). Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism: The Carus Lectures, 1988. University of Chicago Press.
Michael J. McGandy (2006). Review: Naoko Saito. The Gleam of Light: Moral Perfectionism and Education in Dewey and Emerson. American Philosophy Series. Foreword by Stanley Cavell New York: Fordham University Press, 2005. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):303-304.
Vincent Colapietro (2004). The Question of Voice and the Limits of Pragmatism: Emerson, Dewey, and Cavell. Metaphilosophy 35 (1-2):178-201.
Steven G. Affeldt (2004). Review of David Mikics, The Romance of Individualism in Emerson and Nietzsche. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (9).
Joseph Urbas (2009). True Romance: Emerson's Realism. Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):113-147.
Randy L. Friedman (2007). Traditions of Pragmatism and the Myth of the Emersonian Democrat. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (1):154-184.
Stanley Cavell (1989). This New yet Unapproachable America: Lectures After Emerson After Wittgenstein. Living Batch Press.
David A. Granger (2008). Naoko Saito, 2005, The Gleam of Light: Moral Perfectionism and Education in Dewey and Emerson, Foreword by Stanley Cavell. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (6):475-480.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (ed.) (1995). Emerson's Antislavery Writings. Yale University Press.
Lawrence Buell (2003). Emerson. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2012-07-06
Total downloads165 ( #21,955 of 1,907,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #20,638 of 1,907,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?