The calculus of propositions and self-contradiction
Philosophical Review 48 (3):322-325 (1939)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGregor Damschen (2010). Are There Ultimately Founded Propositions? Universitas Philosophica 54:163-177.
Alan Rose (1953). The M-Valued Calculus of Non-Contradiction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (3):237-241.
Kevin C. Klement, Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Edward N. Zalta (1997). The Modal Object Calculus and its Interpretation. In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer.
John D. Norton (2007). Disbelief as the Dual of Belief. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):231 – 252.
E. -W. Stachow (1978). Quantum Logical Calculi and Lattice Structures. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):347 - 386.
Robert Lane (1997). Peirce’s ‘Entanglement’ with the Principles of Excluded Middle and Contradiction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33 (3):680 - 703.
E. -W. Stachow (1976). Completeness of Quantum Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):237 - 280.
John D. Norton (1994). The Theory of Random Propositions. Erkenntnis 41 (3):325 - 352.
Xinyan Jiang (1992). The Law of Non‐Contradiction and Chinese Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):1-14.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,550 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
