Synthese 170 (3):331 - 347 (2009)
|Abstract||The paper is concerned with the bad company problem as an instance of a more general difficulty in the philosophy of mathematics. The paper focuses on the prospects of stability as a necessary condition on acceptability. However, the conclusion of the paper is largely negative. As a solution to the bad company problem, stability would undermine the prospects of a neo-Fregean foundation for set theory, and, as a solution to the more general difficulty, it would impose an unreasonable constraint on mathematical practice.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Renling Jin (1997). Type Two Cuts, Bad Cuts and Very Bad Cuts. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1241-1252.
Joseph Ullian & Nelson Goodman (1975). Bad Company: A Reply to Mr. Zabludowski and Others. Journal of Philosophy 72 (5):142-145.
C. J. F. Williams (1992). Theaetetus in Bad Company. Philosophy 67 (262):549-.
Øystein Linnebo (2009). Introduction. Synthese 170 (3).
Matti Eklund (2009). Bad Company and Neo-Fregean Philosophy. Synthese 170 (3):393 - 414.
Stewart Shapiro (2003). Prolegomenon to Any Future Neo-Logicist Set Theory: Abstraction and Indefinite Extensibility. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):59--91.
Philip A. Ebert & Stewart Shapiro (2009). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Synthese 170 (3):415 - 441.
Øystein Linnebo (2009). Bad Company Tamed. Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391.
Maureen Sie (2000). Mad, Bad, or Disagreeing? On Moral Competence and Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 3 (3):262 – 281.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?