Digital nominalism. Notes on the ethics of information society in view of the ontology of the digital
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):223-231 (2004)
The commodification of code demands two preconditions: a belief if the existence of code and a system of ownership for the code. An examination of these preconditions is helpful for resisting the further widening of digital divides. The ontological belief in the relatively independent existence of code is dependent on our understanding of what the “digital” is. Here it is claimed that the digital is not a natural kind, but a concept that is relative to our practices of interpretation. An interpretative system that sees code as something that can or should always be owned implies an increase of social control and threatens vital processes of knowledge creation that are necessary for an open and egalitarian information society. The ontological belief in “digital code” thus provides the backdrop for an ethical view of the information society. Consequently, if we see digital code as an interpretative notion (in the nominalist way), the ethical questions appear in a different light.
|Keywords||ICT digital divide digitalness disorganisations free software information society intellectual property knowledge creation ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrea Iacovella (2009). Part I. Can Ict Tell History?: 1. Elements for a Digital Historiography. In Bernard Reber & Claire Brossaud (eds.), Digital Cognitive Technologies: Epistemology and Knowledge Society. Iste Ltd.
Ankit Mehrotra & Reeti Agarwal, Digital Libraries - a Cyber Reading Room: Its Perception and Usage Among Management Faculty.
Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi (2004). The Tragedy of the Digital Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
John Zeimbekis (forthcoming). Digital Pictures, Sampling and Vagueness (The Ontology of Digital Pictures). Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
Luciano Floridi (2005). The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185-200.
Joohan Kim (2001). Phenomenology of Digital-Being. Human Studies 24 (1-2):87-111.
Zonghao Bao & Kun Xiang (2006). Digitalization and Global Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):41-47.
Soraj Hongladarom (2004). Making Information Transparent as a Means to Close the Global Digital Divide. Minds and Machines 14 (1):85-99.
Rafael Capurro (2006). Towards an Ontological Foundation of Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):175-186.
Ann Light (2010). The Panopticon Reaches Within: How Digital Technology Turns Us Inside Out. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):583-598.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #126,509 of 1,004,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?