David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (2):139 – 140 (1994)
Abstract In her recent discussion of the problem of the empirical basis, Susan Haack sets out to show that the solutions offered by the Popperian school are all inadequate. Her objectives, however, go well beyond the mere refutation of such?claims. She also tries to explicate the contribution of experience to the justification of one's belief, thus adjudicating between founda?tionalism and coherentism. She puts forward what she calls a ?foundherentist? account of the structure of justification which, she claims, retains the virtues of both foundationalism and coherentism while avoiding their vices. In this article I shall try to show that, in addition to failing to explicate the justificatory role of experience, her proposal is actually a version of coherentism and that a coherentist need not find her account of the contribution of experience to justification particularly objectionable
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. Rorty (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman (1967). A Causal Theory of Knowing. Journal of Philosophy 64 (12):357-372.
William P. Alston (1983). What's Wrong with Immediate Knowledge? Synthese 55 (April):73-96.
Fred D'Agostino & John Watkins (1987). Science and Scepticism. Philosophical Quarterly 37 (146):104.
Robert Audi (1982). Believing and Affirming. Mind 91 (361):115-120.
Citations of this work BETA
Ali Akbar Navabi (2007). Philosophy of Science in Iran. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):75 – 89.
Similar books and articles
Robert Stern (2004). Coherence as a Test for Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):296–326.
T. Shogenji (2001). The Role of Coherence in Epistemic Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):90 – 106.
Gregg Ten Elshof (2007). Religious Experience, Conceptual Contribution and the Problem of Diversity. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:235-250.
Gregg Ten Elshof (2007). Religious Experience, Conceptual Contribution and the Problem of Diversity: How Not to Make the Problem Worse. Philosophical Explorations 32:235-250.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael J. Shaffer (2002). Coherence, Justification, and the AGM Theory of Belief Revision. In Yves Bouchard (ed.), Perspectives on Coherentism. Editions du Scribe 139--160.
Refeng Tang (2010). Conceptualism and the New Myth of the Given. Synthese 175 (1):101-122.
Hamid Vahid (2012). Burge on Perceptual Entitlement. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):187-203.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #222,342 of 1,940,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,411 of 1,940,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?