Inference of object use from pantomimed actions by aphasics and patients with right hemisphere lesions
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 104 (1):43 - 57 (1995)
Twenty-four aphasic and fifteen right brain-damaged subjects were compared on their ability to identify the objects whose use was depicted in a series of twenty videotaped pantomimes. Aphasics were inferior to right brain-damaged patients in inferring object use. Success was correlated with Performance IQ, but not with language measures. Analysis of movement features contributing to subjects' choices reveal speed of movement and object weight to be the most robust and hand shape and size to be the most fragile.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Francesca Gilio, Elisa Iacovelli, Maria Gabriele, Elena Giacomelli, Cinzia Lorenzano, Floriana Picchiorri, Anna M. Cipriani, Maria T. Faedda & Maurizio Inghilleri (2008). Cortical Excitability in Patients with Focal Epilepsy: A Study with High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1):28-32.
Peter De Graef & Filip Germeys (2003). Reading the Scene: Application of E-Z Reader to Object and Scene Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):479-480.
Adil E. Shamoo, Dianne N. Irving & Patricia Langenberg (1997). A Review of Patient Outcomes in Pharmacological Studies From the Psychiatric Literature, 1966–1993. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):395-406.
Marie-Dominique Giraudo & Andrew B. Slifkin (2004). Is the Concept of Object Still a Suitable Notion? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):707-708.
M. Behrmann & D. V. Meegan (1998). Visuomotor Processing in Unilateral Neglect. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):381-409.
Eleanor M. Saffran & H. Branch Coslett (2001). Further Evidence in Support of a Distributed Semantic Memory System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):492-493.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
Lucia Vaina (1983). From Shapes and Movements to Objects and Actions. Synthese 54 (January):3-36.
Jules Davidoff & Claudio Luzzatti (2005). Language Impairment and Colour Categories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):494-495.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #372,333 of 1,139,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,515 of 1,139,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?