Philosophical methodology: The current debate
Philosophical Psychology 23 (3):391-417 (forthcoming)
| Abstract | In this paper I investigate current issues in the methodology of philosophy. In particular, the epistemology of intuition and the status of empirical work on the use of intuition in philosophy | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTamar Gendler (2010). Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Juha Saatsi (2012). Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer.
Alex Viskovatoff (2003). Rationalism and Mainstream Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):397-415.
Robert Sinclair (2002). What is Radical Interpretation? Davidson, Fodor, and the Naturalization of Philosophy. Inquiry 45 (2):161-184.
Bruce Caldwell (2009). A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison Versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):315-324.
Christopher B. Gray (2010). The Methodology of Maurice Hauriou: Legal, Sociological, Philosophical. Rodopi.
Uskali Mäki (ed.) (2002). Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-11Total downloads47 ( #23,189 of 551,054 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,467 of 551,054 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
