David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):110-137 (2014)
: This paper discusses the function and scope of incompatibilist or transcendental freedom in Kant's moral philosophy. The prevailing view among scholars, most notably Allison, is that the function of transcendental freedom is to enable us to articulate a first-person conception of ourselves as rational agents involved in deliberation and choice. Thus, the scope of transcendental freedom is rational agency in general. In order to perform this function, freedom has to be merely conceivable. Pace Allison, I argue that our first-person conception is neutral with respect to causal determinism, and that the function of transcendental freedom is to provide the metaphysical conditions of the possibility of genuine moral responsibility and perfect justice, and to get rid of moral luck. In order to perform this function, transcendental freedom has to be not just conceivable, but metaphysically real. My view suggests that we only have reason to attribute freedom to ourselves in situations in which we are aware that the moral law commands us categorically. We do not have a similar reason to believe we are free in purely prudential choices. Thus, the scope of transcendental freedom is not rational agency in general, but only moral agency
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Henry E. Allison (1990). Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Engstrom (1993). Allison on Rational Agency. Inquiry 36 (4):405 – 418.
Henry E. Allison (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):480 – 488.
Iuliana Corina Vaida (2009). A New Kantian Solution to the Third Antinomy of Pure Reason and to the Free Will Problem. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):403-431.
Andrews Reath (1993). Intelligible Character and the Reciprocity Thesis. Inquiry 36 (4):419 – 430.
Henry E. Allison (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2001). Freedom and the Distinction Between Phenomena and Noumena: Is Allison's View Methodological, Metaphysical, or Equivocal? Journal of Philosophical Research 26:593-622.
Kelly Coble (2004). Should Freedom Be the Ground of Morality? Idealistic Studies 34 (2):181-197.
By Alan Carter (2003). Morality and Freedom. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):161–180.
Bernard Carnois (1987). The Coherence of Kant's Doctrine of Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
Theodore Guleserian (2000). Divine Freedom and the Problem of Evil. Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):348-366.
Iain Morrisson (2007). Moral and Nonmoral Freedom in Kant. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):129-148.
Patrick R. Frierson (2003). Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Onof (2009). Reconstructing the Grounding of Kant's Ethics: A Critical Assessment. Kant-Studien 100 (4):496-517.
Added to index2011-09-16
Total downloads21 ( #67,568 of 1,018,103 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,012 of 1,018,103 )
How can I increase my downloads?