Can Entanglement Be Destroyed by Any Local Operation in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory?
Philosophy of Science 77 (5):1029-1041 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRob Clifton & Hans Halvorson (2001). Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):1-31.
Miklós Rédei & Giovanni Valente (2010). How Local Are Local Operations in Local Quantum Field Theory? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):346-353.
Miklos Redei (1991). Bell's Inequalities, Relativistic Quantum Field Theory and the Problem of Hidden Variables. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):628-638.
Simon W. Saunders (1992). Locality, Complex Numbers, and Relativistic Quantum Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:365 - 380.
Edward MacKinnon (2007). Schwinger and the Ontology of Quantum Field Theory. Foundations of Science 12 (4).
J. F. Geurdes (1995). Relation Betweenrelativistic Quantum Mechanics an Classical Em Field Theory. Physical Review E 51 (5):5151-5154.
Rob Clifton (2002). The Subtleties of Entanglement and its Role in Quantum Information Theory. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S150-S167.
Michael Redhead (1994). The Vacuum in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:77 - 87.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-06-29Total downloads5 ( #160,428 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,125 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
