Libertarianism and the state

Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):187-205 (2007)
Although Robert Nozick has argued that libertarianism is compatible with the justice of a minimal state—even if does not arise from mutual consent—few have been persuaded. I will outline a different way of establishing that a non-consensual libertarian state can be just. I will show that a state can—with a few important qualifications—justly enforce the rights of citizens, extract payments to cover the costs of such enforcement, redistribute resources to the poor, and invest in infrastructure to overcome market failures. Footnotesa For very helpful comments, I am indebted to Dani Attas, Ellen Frankel Paul, Robert <span class='Hi'>Johnson</span>, Brian Kierland, Mike Otsuka, Eric Roark, and the other contributors to this volume
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052507070082
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Peter Vallentyne, Libertarianism and the state
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Arabella Fisher (forthcoming). A Left-Libertarian Proposal for Egalitarian World Ownership. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

128 ( #16,107 of 1,724,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #41,252 of 1,724,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.