David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):187-205 (2007)
Although Robert Nozick has argued that libertarianism is compatible with the justice of a minimal state—even if does not arise from mutual consent—few have been persuaded. I will outline a different way of establishing that a non-consensual libertarian state can be just. I will show that a state can—with a few important qualifications—justly enforce the rights of citizens, extract payments to cover the costs of such enforcement, redistribute resources to the poor, and invest in infrastructure to overcome market failures. Footnotesa For very helpful comments, I am indebted to Dani Attas, Ellen Frankel Paul, Robert Johnson, Brian Kierland, Mike Otsuka, Eric Roark, and the other contributors to this volume
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcus Agnafors (2015). Mixing Interest and Control? Assessing Peter Vallentyne’s Hybrid Theory of Rights. Philosophia 43 (4):933-949.
Arabella Fisher (2015). A Left-Libertarian Proposal for Egalitarian World Ownership. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (6):599-619.
M. L. J. Wissenburg (2011). Parenting and Intergenerational Justice: Why Collective Obligations Towards Future Generations Take Second Place to Individual Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (6):557-573.
Similar books and articles
Ralf M. Bader & John Meadowcroft (eds.) (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Kraut (1997). Aristotelianism and Libertarianism. Critical Review 11 (3):359-372.
John Hasnas (2003). Reflections on the Minimal State. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):115-128.
Peter Simpson (1995). Community in a New Libertarianism: Rejoinder to Legutko. Critical Review 9 (3):427-429.
Murray Rothbard (1977). Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
Barbara H. Fried (2005). Begging the Question with Style: Anarchy, State, and Utopia at Thirty Years. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):221-254.
Ryszard Legutko (1995). Libertarianism Vs. Community: Reply to Simpson. Critical Review 9 (3):421-425.
Peter Vallentyne (2006). Left-Libertarianism and Private Discrimination. San Diego Law Review 43:981-994.
Edward Feser (2005). There is No Such Thing as an Unjust Initial Acquisition. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):56-80.
Nicolas Maloberti (2009). Libertarianism and the Possibility of the Legitimate State. Libertarian Papers 1 (5):1-12.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads160 ( #22,340 of 1,796,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #29,546 of 1,796,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?