Names that can be said of everything: Porphyrian tradition and 'transcendental' terms in twelfth-century logic
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):298-310 (2007)
In an article published in 2003, Klaus Jacobi—using texts partially edited in De Rijk's Logica Modernorum—demonstrated that twelfth-century logic contains a tradition of reflecting about some of the transcendental names (nomina transcendentia). In addition to reinforcing Jacobi's thesis with other texts, this contribution aims to demonstrate two points: 1) That twelfth-century logical reflection about transcendental terms has its origin in the logica vetus, and especially in a passage from Porphyry Isagoge and in Boethius's commentary on it. In spite of the loss of the major part of the Aristotelian corpus, the twelfth-century masters in logic still received some Aristotelian theses concerning the notions of one and being via Porphyry and Boethius; on the basis of such theses, they were able to elaborate a sort of proto-theory of the transcendentals as trans-categorical terms. 2) That this theory is centred on the idea that there exists a particular group of names which have the property that they can be said of everything; this group includes "being", "one", "thing" and "something" (ens, unum, res, aliquid). Twelfth-century masters in logic try to question the (originally Aristotelian) thesis that these terms are equivocal, although they do not deny it completely.
|Keywords||THING BOETHIUS SOMETHING PORPHYRY TRANSCENDENTAL TERMS PETER ABELARD ONE TWELFTH-CENTURY LOGIC BEING|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo & [From Old Catalog] (1956). Twelfth Century Logic. Roma, Edizioni Di Storia Et Letteratura.
Constance Brittain Bouchard (2003). Every Valley Shall Be Exalted: The Discourse of Opposites in Twelfth-Century Thought. Cornell University Press.
Nauta, Lodewijk Willem, William of Conches and the Tradition of Boethius' Consolatio Philosophiae : An Edition of His Glosae Super Boetium and Studies of the Latin Commentary Tradition.
Christopher J. Martin (2007). Denying Conditionals: Abaelard and the Failure of Boethius' Account of the Hypothetical Syllogism. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):153-168.
Eleonore Stump (1980). Dialectic in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries: Garlandus Compotista. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):1-18.
Peter Dronke (ed.) (1988). A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
L. M. De Rijk (1962). Logica Modernorum. Assen, Van Gorcum.
Christopher J. Martin (2010). They Had Added Not a Single Tiny Proposition: The Reception of the Prior Analytics in the First Half of the Twelfth Century. Vivarium 48 (1-2):159-192.
L. M. De Rijk (1966). Some New Evidence on Twelfth Century Logic. Vivarium 4 (1):1-57.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #114,321 of 1,102,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,864 of 1,102,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?