Praedicaturi supponimus. Is Gilbert of Poitiers approach to the problem of linguistic reference a pragmatic one?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Vivarium 49 (1-3):50-74 (2011)
The article investigates how the problem of (linguistic) reference is treated in Gilbert of Poitiers' Commentaries on Boethius' Opuscula sacra . In this text the terms supponere, suppositus,-a,-um , and suppositio mainly concern the act of a speaker (or of the author of a written text) that consists of referring—by choosing a name as subject term in a proposition—to one or more subsistent things as what the speech act (or the written text) is about. Supposition is for Gilbert an action performed by a speaker, not a property of terms, and his `contextual approach' has a pragmatic touch: “we do not predicate in order to supposit as much as we supposit in order to predicate“. Language is considered by Gilbert as a system for communication between human beings, key notions are the `sense in the author's mind' ( sensus mentis eius qui loquitur ) and the `interpreter's understanding' ( intelligentia lectoris ). The phenomenon of `disciplinal' discourse (“man is a species of individuals“) is treated by means of these hermeneutic notions and not by means of a special kind of supposition
|Keywords||Contextual approach Hermeneutics Pragmatics Res supposita suppositio reference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kent Bach (2006). What Does It Take To Refer? In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press 516--554.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). We and the Plural Subject. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):235-259.
L. M. De Rijk (1988). Semantics and Metaphysics in Gilbert of Poitiers. Vivarium 26 (2):73-112.
Kent Bach (2004). Minding the Gap. In Claudia Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Csli 27--43.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2010). Doctoral Dissertation: A Philosophical Study of the Concept of Mind (with Special Reference to Rene Descartes, David Hume and Gilbert Ryle). Dissertation, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
Robert Nola (1980). Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):505-531.
Hartley Slater, Epsilon Calculi. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scott MacDonald (1999). Gilbert of Poitiers' Metaphysics of Goodness. Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales:57-77.
Philippe Schlenker (2006). Ontological Symmetry in Language: A Brief Manifesto. Mind and Language 21 (4):504–539.
Palle Leth (2011). Paraphrase and Rhetorical Adjustment. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg
Kristijan Krkac (2003). Smells Like Pragmatism: Wittgenstein's Anti-Sceptical Weapons. Prolegomena 2 (1):41-60.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Daniel R. Gilbert (1992). Strategy Through Process and the Problem of Strategic Management. The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:82-96.
Added to index2011-10-29
Total downloads34 ( #118,373 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #36,372 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?