“Response-dependence, rigidification, and objectivity”, erkenntnis 44 (1995): 101-112
Erkenntnis 44:101-112 (1995)
| Abstract | A fully developed sophisticated response-dependent account would fill in specifications for B (the beings) and C (the conditions), would probably replace the reference to disapproval with a reference to a more complex response, and might involve a more complex scheme.[ii] For simplicity, however, I shall focus my argument on the above simple scheme of moral wrongness, since added complexities will be irrelevant to my argument. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Nenad Miščević (2011). No More Tears in Heaven: Two Views of Response-Dependence. Acta Analytica 26 (1):75-93.
Jussi Haukioja (2007). How (Not) to Specify Normal Conditions for Response-Dependent Concepts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.
Nick Zangwill (2003). Against Moral Response-Dependence. Erkenntnis 59 (3):285 - 290.
Frank A. Hindriks (2006). Acceptance-Dependence: A Social Kind of Response-Dependence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Rafael De Clercq (2002). Two Conceptions of Response-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159 - 177.
Jeremy Randel Koons (2003). Why Response-Dependence Theories of Morality Are False. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):275-294.
Jeremy Randel Koons (2003). Why Response-Dependence Theories of Morality Are False. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):275 - 294.
Rafael de Clercq (2002). Two Conceptions of Response-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
Peter Vallentyne (1996). Response-Dependence, Rigidification and Objectivity. Erkenntnis 44 (1):101 - 112.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #6,121 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |

