David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):157-170 (2010)
This paper argues in favor of more widespread and systematic applications of a virtue-based normative framework to questions about the ethical impact of information technologies, and social networking technologies in particular. The first stage of the argument identifies several distinctive features of virtue ethics that make it uniquely suited to the domain of IT ethics, while remaining complementary to other normative approaches. I also note its potential to reconcile a number of significant methodological conflicts and debates in the existing literature, including tensions between phenomenological and constructivist perspectives. Finally, I claim that a virtue-based perspective is needed to correct for a strong utilitarian bias in the research methodologies of existing empirical studies on the social and ethical impact of IT. The second part of the paper offers an abbreviated demonstration of the merits of virtue ethics by showing how it might usefully illuminate the moral dimension of emerging social networking technologies. I focus here on the potential impact of such technologies on three virtues typically honed in communicative practices: patience, honesty and empathy.
|Keywords||Aristotle Communicative virtues Empirical turn Social capital Social networking technology Virtue ethics Well-being|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Fuchs (2010). studiVZ: Social Networking in the Surveillance Society. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):171-185.
Diane P. Michelfelder (2000). Our Moral Condition in Cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):147-152.
Sonja Olin-Lauritzen & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.) (2007). Medical Technologies and the Life World: The Social Construction of Normality. Routledge.
Yoni Van Den Eede (2010). “Conversation of Mankind” or “Idle Talk”?: A Pragmatist Approach to Social Networking Sites. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):195-206.
Christoph Jedan (2009). Stoic Virtues: Chrysippus and the Theological Foundations of Stoic Ethics. Continuum.
Kari Väyrynen (2001). Virtue Ethics and the Material Values of Nature. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):137-148.
Sanaa Askool & Keiichi Nakata (2011). A Conceptual Model for Acceptance of Social CRM Systems Based on a Scoping Study. AI and Society 26 (3):205-220.
Rachel Batchelor, Ania Bobrowicz, Robin Mackenzie & Alisoun Milne (2012). Challenges of Ethical and Legal Responsibilities When Technologies' Uses and Users Change: Social Networking Sites, Decision-Making Capacity and Dementia. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):99-108.
Mary J. Granger & Joyce Currie Little (2001). Creating an Organizational Awareness of Ethical Responsibility About Information Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):239-246.
James L. Parrish (2010). PAPA Knows Best: Principles for the Ethical Sharing of Information on Social Networking Sites. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):187-193.
Added to index2009-08-17
Total downloads119 ( #6,072 of 1,008,729 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,702 of 1,008,729 )
How can I increase my downloads?