David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 3 (1):49-66 (1988)
Concepts and methods originating in one discipline can distort the structure of another when they are applied to the latter. I exemplify this mostly with reference to systematic biology, especially problems which have arisen in relation to the nature of species. Thus the received views of classes, individuals (which term I suggest be replaced by units to avoid misunderstandings), and sets are all inapplicable, but each can be suitably modified. The concept of fuzzy set was developed to deal with species and I defend its applicability. Taxa at all levels are real and participate in biological processes. Analysis of cause and pattern provides the deep structure in which metabiology is grounded; violation of this principle has led to diverse errors in biology.
|Keywords||Concept transfer species sets|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Pascal Acot (1983). Darwin Et L'Écologie. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 36 (1):33-48.
John Beatty (1980). What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Morton Beckner (1968). The Biological Way of Thought. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Robert N. Brandon (1981). Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (2):91-105.
Arthur L. Caplan (1979). Darwinism and Deductivist Models of Theory Structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (4):341-353.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). Microbiology and the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):553-568.
Christopher D. Horvath (1997). Discussion: Phylogenetic Species Concept: Pluralism, Monism, and History. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 12 (2):225-232.
Marc Ereshefsky (1991). Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution. Philosophy of Science 58 (1):84-101.
Hugh Lehman (1967). Are Biological Species Real? Philosophy of Science 34 (2):157-167.
Joel Cracraft (1987). Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):329-346.
Mark Greene (2011). On the Origin of Species Notions and Their Ethical Limitations. In Tom L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press 577-602.
Mark Ridley (1989). The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Philip Kitcher (1984). Species. Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
Bradley E. Wilson (1991). Are Species Sets? Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):413-431.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #201,792 of 1,699,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?